<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Solely to shuffle money around</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davidcflood.com/weblog/index.php/2009/12/14/solely-to-shuffle-money-around/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davidcflood.com/weblog/2009/12/14/solely-to-shuffle-money-around/</link>
	<description>misadventures at harvard medical school</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 00:28:55 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eric Rentsch</title>
		<link>http://davidcflood.com/weblog/2009/12/14/solely-to-shuffle-money-around/comment-page-1/#comment-57910</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Rentsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 18:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidcflood.com/weblog/?p=1149#comment-57910</guid>
		<description>&quot;No Gridlines!&quot;

Hey Flood,

I like to stop by your blog every few weeks and catch up on your progression. Its fun to read about! This post was something I can relate to. I often think about the &quot;value&quot; I create in consulting - a spreadsheet, a deck? Useful information (sometimes!), but its still not that tangible. I&#039;m a step removed from just &quot;moving money&quot;, but it isn&#039;t that far. 

But, if the work isn&#039;t &quot;valuable&quot; as I perceive it, why is so much money put into it? Why does our economy pay for bankers, business leaders, or consultants? Do I not know all the information? Maybe I&#039;m missing something?

Let&#039;s assuming I do have all the information, and if that is the case then I guess my definition of &quot;value&quot; doesn&#039;t always line up with a capitalistic or economic definition of value. It&#039;s worth realizing, though, that clearly not everyone shares the same definition of value. Is there one right definition of value?

I won&#039;t be able to make it to Dewitt for the bar tomorrow night, but I hope you&#039;re well!

Eric

p.s. someone made the point of calling out &quot;no grid lines&quot; to me the other day. Your line made me laugh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;No Gridlines!&#8221;</p>
<p>Hey Flood,</p>
<p>I like to stop by your blog every few weeks and catch up on your progression. Its fun to read about! This post was something I can relate to. I often think about the &#8220;value&#8221; I create in consulting &#8211; a spreadsheet, a deck? Useful information (sometimes!), but its still not that tangible. I&#8217;m a step removed from just &#8220;moving money&#8221;, but it isn&#8217;t that far. </p>
<p>But, if the work isn&#8217;t &#8220;valuable&#8221; as I perceive it, why is so much money put into it? Why does our economy pay for bankers, business leaders, or consultants? Do I not know all the information? Maybe I&#8217;m missing something?</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s assuming I do have all the information, and if that is the case then I guess my definition of &#8220;value&#8221; doesn&#8217;t always line up with a capitalistic or economic definition of value. It&#8217;s worth realizing, though, that clearly not everyone shares the same definition of value. Is there one right definition of value?</p>
<p>I won&#8217;t be able to make it to Dewitt for the bar tomorrow night, but I hope you&#8217;re well!</p>
<p>Eric</p>
<p>p.s. someone made the point of calling out &#8220;no grid lines&#8221; to me the other day. Your line made me laugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

